legal insights
19. January 2026
Legal Changes in 2026
As usual, the new year comes with numerous legal changes. Some initiatives that were originally intended to take effect at the beginning of the year have not yet been enacted. If and how these legislative proposals will still be implemented is currently unclear. Below, we aim to provide a concise overview of the most important...
Reading time: 11 min
18. November 2025
“Hands off” registered mail
Unlike the former registered mail with peel-off label, the new digital registered mail is no longer suitable as prima facie evidence. This is the result of a decision by the Hamburg Regional Labor Court (July 14, 2025 – 4 SLa 26/24). Facts The Hamburg Regional Labor Court had to rule on the validity of a...
Reading time: 4 min
Employment law
5. November 2025
The Individual Voice in the Crosshairs of Artificial Intelligence
Whether public figure or private individual – unauthorized access to one’s own voice, its misuse, and the resulting consequences can affect anyone. Such misuse also leads to a general loss of trust and a decrease in the value of audio recordings of all kinds. It is therefore more than welcome that the Berlin Regional Court...
Reading time: 7 min
Intellectual Property and Competition Law
30. October 2025
When does an agreement qualify as a “commercial agency agreement” (and why does that matter)?
Whether an agreement is a commercial agency agreement is determined by the actual content of the agreement. The name of the agreement is not relevant. Instead, the overall picture of the circumstances is decisive. This is the result of the judgement of the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Frankfurt am Main of 8 July 2025 (Case...
Trade and Distribution Law
21. October 2025
Damages for unlawful video surveillance at work
The unlawful and almost complete video surveillance of an employee at work over a period of 22 months has resulted in the employer being ordered to pay damages of €15,000. In the absence of any legal justification, the intensive video surveillance constituted a serious infringement of the employee’s personal rights. This was decided by the...
1. October 2025
Reimbursement of training and education costs – Hamm Regional Labor Court sets new standards for employment contract drafting
If a clause triggers the reimbursement of training costs when the employment relationship is terminated “at the request” of the employee, this means the indiscriminate termination of the employment relationship by the employee giving notice. With this content, the clause is unreasonably disadvantageous within the meaning of Section 307 (1) sentence 1 of the German...
18. September 2025
No violation of the General Equal Treatment Act in rejecting an external applicant who has reached the standard retirement age
The question of whether external applicants who were not previously employed by the employer and have already reached the standard retirement age may be rejected on the basis of their age was recently decided by the Federal Labor Court (BAG) (judgment of May 8, 2025 – 8 AZR 299/24). The BAG concluded that although age...
Reading time: 3 min
3. September 2025
Disproportionately long probationary period in fixed-term employment – terminability of the employee
A probationary period that corresponds to the entire duration of the fixed-term employment relationship is generally inadmissible. However, if a termination option has been agreed in addition to the probationary period, the invalidity of the probationary period provision does not affect the possibility of ordinary termination. This was clarified by the Federal Labor Courtin its...
2. September 2025
No enforcement of a non-competition clause in a two-member limited liability company through legal action by the co-member
In a company with only two shareholders, a claim by the company against one of the shareholders cannot simply be asserted by way of an actio pro socio (shareholder action). The remaining shareholder entitled to vote must bring the action in the name of the company. He or she may represent the company in court...
Corporate law
22. August 2025
Attribution of fraudulent conduct by a testing company in the context of the conformity assessment procedure
If a manufacturer of personal protective equipment within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/425 (PPE Regulation) engages a testing company as part of the conformity assessment procedure for its products, it must accept responsibility for any fraudulent conduct on the part of that testing company. This has been decided by the ruling...
1 – 10
You need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Turnstile. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.